FC: EC-2011.
For several years, whenever the stutter of the existing (new) rules officiating in FC, I itching to speak, but can not because I have no theoretical preparation for a reasoned expression. And the more I can not support a constructive dialogue on this terrible subject.
Here today Vaytsehovskaya in Sport-Express his statement that the interest in the QF decreased due to the fact that the new system do not understand the audience, stepped on my pet peeve, and I once again breaks into a thousand koalok!
I want to make me finally explained, it is unclear in this system?? Or rather, why it is not clear compared with the "6.0"? (If you do not deal with the widespread opinion that new system kills the artistic side FC - with him the way, I also do not agree, because just expensive Stephane Lambiel in all its glory demonstrates the opposite.)
As the average viewer does not differ from the axel flip, I generally understand the logic of the new system and do not understand the logic of the old. And the new system for me at times is more transparent. At least at the basic level, when the screen appear PB, SB, and all points that allow me to somehow compare the two skaters in a single launch (when used in lambel_ru assorted protocols, I was more understandable, but not right now about this, it is beyond the average) and to understand that some can expect a man with his 78 points in short. From this constant whining about what was previously understood, and now not? What is it used to be understood?
I vaguely remember the ancient history at some Championship, it seems, when Urmanov skated around a third from the end, got some estimates, meaning that the number and location. Among the places were all kinds, 3rd, 6th, but no one first ... Then laminated a few more athletes. The final result is - drum roll - Urmanov first. This is understandable, right? A score of 220 vs 250 is very confusing ... I'm surprised.
0 comments:
Post a Comment